![]() ![]() I won’t replace my 35 1.4 with an EF 35 1.4 II because I cannot use focus breathing comp. ![]() I won’t replace my 24 1.4 with an EF 24 1.4 II, the IQ is a night and day difference. I won’t replace my 14 1.8 with an EF 14 2.8. I added it to my collection for hybrid video use, but I must say I am somewhat disappointed with a few pet peeves that I find I end up grabbing the Sony more so because of convenience. ![]() I love my R5, I can’t wait to see what the firmware update will do. Maybe for external elevations of buildings it would be pretty spectacular.ĭump the Sony stuff-problem solved!I wish I could, I’m actually leaning the other way if we don’t get these announcements soon. 14mm is too wide, I would just be cropping in so much to get a usable interior shot. You can drop to about 20mm and it's passable IMO. The 17mm isn't usable for interiors, without cropping in most of the time, as it distorts rooms too much. I also have both the 17mm and 24mm TS-E lenses and find I try to keep the 24mm on, and use the 17mm for when it gets too tight. And screw-in filters while we\'re at it.I agree with all of this. I hope they bring one of those to RF mount. The current 17 is too wide for most things and is plenty for the few uses I do have for it. I\'ll prolly just buck up and and go along.Īnd 14 mm is so wide I worry it will be mostly useless except for the tiniest of interior spaces spaces. I don\'t use \'tilt\' either, but I understand they can\'t go so small-niche as to make manual focus shift-only lenses cost effectively. Autofocus is a thing I don\'t need for architectural and don\'t want to pay for. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |